![]() |
![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also posted to ERAS:
Over the past few years, the changes to the British Columbia Wildlife Act, specifically the Controlled Alien Species Regulation, have gotten a lot of attention. [see link for the regulation] http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bcl...eeside/94_2009 Something of special note is the fact that despite being a regulation within the "wildlife" act, there is precisely NOTHING in this regulation which addresses actual impacts on wildlife. Ostensibly, this regulation was largely modeled on Alberta's regulation, although the latter actually does deal with the potential for introduction of exotic species. This might be due to ANOTHER set of rules that people overlook. In Alberta, there has been some confusion arising from people not realising that *native* species will obviously NOT be dealt with in *exotic* species regulations. There's a similar situation in BC law. Except that the BC law was written by a moron, and doesn't actually list BC species. You'll find it here, and I will make some key summary points: http://www.bclaws.ca/EPLibraries/bcl...side/13_168_90 This is the "Designation and Exemption Regulation". I looked there, because it seemed to me that any listing of 'game', 'non-game', 'upland game bird', etc., would fit there. Bingo. Here is a key quote of what are considered "wildlife" [that is native and protected species which you can't catch or kill except to protect life or property] This regulation is dated 2000, and thus will not accomodate taxonomy later than that. However, it was updated in 2009, and some of the taxonomy clearly reflects that:
Quote:
(a) all species of the family Ambystomatidae — mole salamanders; That includes all species of tiger salamander, blue-spotted, spotted, marbled, Anderson's salamanders, AND axolotls. Yes. "Wildlife" and illegal to possess. (c) all species of the family Plethodontidae — lungless salamanders; BC has three native species and one spreading exotic species. The exotic species is, of course, protected from harm and possession along with the native ones. Out of several HUNDRED, all of which are ostensibly 'wildlife'. If any should be introduced, you're prohibited from harming them. No Bolitoglossa, no Pseudotriton, no Eurycea, no Desmognathus, and obviously no Plethodon allowed. (d) all species of the family Pelobatidae — spadefoots; In 2000, this family commonly included the tropical Asian Megophrys, Xenophrys, and Leptobrachium, but not long afterwards these were accepted as a separate family Megophryidae. As of 2009, Pelobatidae included only the Eurasian-African Pelobates. Presently, North American spadefoots are placed in family Scaphiopodidae. So are BC Spea intermontana no longer 'wildlife'? Are Megophrys 'wildlife'? Good questions. (e) all species of the family Hylidae — treefrogs; BC has three native hylids, Pseudacris maculata, P.regilla, and P.sierrae [not yet confirmed]. In 2000, this family included many hundreds of species, which are now placed in Phyllomedusidae, Hemiphractidae, Amphignathodontidae, and Pelodryadidae. A SHORT list of popular animals which are illegal to possess therefore includes: Litoria caerulea, infrafrenata, aurea/raniformis, rubella Hyla arborea, chinensis, gratiosa, cinerea, chrysoscelis, squirella, versicolor Gastrotheca spp. Phyllomedusa hypochondrialis, tomopterna, sauvagii, azurea, bicolor Agalychnis callidryas (f) all species of the family Ranidae — true frogs; This is truly an idiotic listing. Family "Ranidae" is possibly the most unstable group ever used, since it is the historical default for ALL frogs. BC ranids include two native Lithobates, three native Rana, and two introduced Lithobates. In recent times, this family has included what are now Rhacophoridae, Hyperoliidae, Mantellidae, Hemisotidae, Ptychadenidae, Arthroleptidae, Pyxicephalidae, Dicroglossidae, Nyctibatrachidae, Ceratobatrachidae, and Phrynobatrachidae [I've likely missed one or two]. I'll be generous and assume they didn't intend to include the first four families. That leaves a HUGE list of illegals, including: Hylarana erythraea Occidozyga laevis Ceratobatrachus guentheri Pyxicephalus edulis Conraua alleni Leptopelis flavomaculatus Phrynobatrachus natalensis Yep. Genius at work. (g) all species of the genus Taricha — newts; Straightforward. So ALL other species of newt and true salamander are legal, many of which could survive in the wild in BC (h) all species of the genus Ascaphus — tailed frogs; Straightforward. Only two species exist, both native to BC. (i) all species of the genus Bufo — toads. This is another problematic dumping ground. All toads not assigned to a unique genus have traditionally been dumped in Bufo. In 2006, this was fixed by reassigning all species according to their actual relationships. Bufo in the strict sense does not occur in the Americas. Toads of BC and most of North America are all now Anaxyrus. This law pre-dates that change, so the following are all protected 'wildlife': Pseudepidalia brongersmai, viridis Phrynoidis asper Duttaphrynus melanostictus Anaxyrus retiformis, debilis, terrestris, americanus, quercicus, punctatus, cognatus, speciosus Incilius nebulifer, valliceps, alvarius Nanophryne variegata Rhinella marina, spinulosa, margaritifer Amietophrynus regularis Rhaebo guttatus
__________________
The trend is to post names and numbers of "pets" here. That seems...um...bulky. 23+ species of salamander 28+ families and subfamilies of reptile, amphibian, and arachnid. Only one has a name. The Beast. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(a) all species of the family Emydidae — pond and river turtles;
One species is native to BC, another is a possibly extirpated native, and another is a spreading introduction. In 2000, this commonly included all species now assigned to Geoemydidae. The following are protected 'wildlife': Chinemys reevesi Trachemys scripta [I think there's an exemption somewhere, but I couldn't find it] Graptemys spp. Malaclemmys terrapin Rhinoclemmys punctularia Terrapene carolina Emys orbicularis Batagur borneoensis Sacalia quadriocellata Cuora amboinensis (b) all species of the family Trionychidae — soft-shelled turtles; None occur anywhere near BC, but if any are introduced, they're protected from harm. Of course, that can't happen because as 'wildlife', they can't be possessed. (c) all species of the family Chelydridae — snapping turtles; Ditto. Reports of introduction without breeding. There IS an exemption to allow killing of snappers in BC, but you can't own them. (e) all species of the genus Podarcis — wall lizards; One species is a spreading introduction, but you can't harm it. Few species are actually in the pet trade. (f) all species of the genus Phrynosoma — horned lizards; One species with a limited distribution in BC. Currently considered extirpated, but reports suggest otherwise. Two species appear regularly in the pet trade, neither makes a good pet, and either might survive introduction. (g) all species of the genus Eumeces — skinks; Dumping ground of unrelated skinks. Eumeces is now restricted to Africa. The only BC representative is Plestiodon skiltonianus. Prohibited species include: Plestiodon obsoletus, inexpectatus, fasciatus, reynoldsi, anthracinus, gilberti, elegans, septentrionalis, chinensis Eumeces schneideri, algeriensis Eurylepis taeniolatus Mesoscincus schwartzei (h) all species of the genus Elgaria — alligator lizards; Straightforward. A single BC species and a handful of others west of the Rockies. (i) all species of the genus Thamnophis — garter snakes; Five BC natives, all protected. Several dozen additional forms prohibited, including: Thamnophis sirtalis concinnus Thamnophis marcianus Thamnophis cyrtopsis Thamnophis atratus Thamnophis proximus Thamnophis sauritus (j) Charina bottae — rubber boa; Straightforward. Native. Except in 2000, included what is now recognized as Charina umbratica. (k) Coluber constrictor — racer; This name includes five species. Those in BC have long been recommended recognition as Coluber mormon. However, all forms are regulated. None is common in the pet trade, and they're not reknowned as pets. (l) Contia tenuis — sharptail snake; Native and apparently highly restricted in BC. A second species restricted to Oregon and California would also be protected by this law, C.longicaudae. (m) Hypsiglena torquata — night snake; Highly limited in BC and deserving of protection. This species is now restricted to Mexico, and BC populations are now H.chlorophaea. All five species are protected in BC. (n) Pituophis catenifer — gopher snake; Pine snakes are fine, Mexican species are fine, but all the western USA forms are banned from possession in BC. The Cape gopher snake, P.vertebralis, was included in P.catenifer at the time of this law, and is thus prohibited. (o) nora semiannulata — ground snake; Nice. No such critter, and thus no standing in law. The actual species would be Sonora semmiannulata, which does not occur in BC. Also not common in the pet trade. (p) Crotalus oreganus — western rattlesnake. Straightforward. You can kill the following 'wildlife':
Quote:
I used to think that Alberta's slightly longer list of prohibited exotic amphibians was questionable. In light of unearthing BC's absurdity, I actually feel even MORE fortunate!
__________________
The trend is to post names and numbers of "pets" here. That seems...um...bulky. 23+ species of salamander 28+ families and subfamilies of reptile, amphibian, and arachnid. Only one has a name. The Beast. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I thought they were somewhat consulting you on this, Andrew.... if so they really didn't do much consulting...
__________________
www.herptacular.co.cc |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|